Vibe Coding Risk Assessment
Seven quick questions about who's using it, what it touches, and who can actually maintain it — answer honestly for a straight read on the risk.
No — it's a quick vibe coding risk assessment, not an audit. The seven questions track the signals that actually drive engineering risk (real users, sensitive data, downtime cost, who can debug it, growth plans, who maintains it, team size), weighted equally. Treat the result as a conversation starter, not a verdict.
It depends entirely on the stakes, not the method. A vibe-coded prototype with no real users is low-risk by definition. The same approach gets genuinely dangerous once paying customers, sensitive data, or real uptime requirements are on the line and nobody on the team can fully debug what's running. That's the exact line this assessment is built to find.
Nothing, for the right project. AI-assisted solo building is a legitimate way to validate an idea fast. The risk shows up later — when real users, money, or sensitive data depend on code nobody on the team can fully explain or debug.
It means they're fine right now. Re-run the check as things change: your first paying customer, your first compliance requirement, or the day you need to hire someone who has to understand the codebase cold.
Usually one of two things: a focused project-recovery pass to stabilize and de-risk what's already built, or a dedicated team that takes real ownership going forward. Which one fits depends on how much of the current code is worth keeping — that's exactly what a conversation with us would figure out.
No — this runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere unless you choose to reach out.